Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions design complexity control" » "coder functions design complexidade control" (Expand search), "coder functions regimen complexity control" (Expand search), "coder functions brain complexity control" (Expand search), "coder function design complexity control" (Expand search), "coder functional design complexity control" (Expand search), "coder foundations design complexity control" (Expand search), "power functions design complexity control" (Expand search), "order functions design complexity control" (Expand search), "colour functions design complexity control" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions design complexity control") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions design complexity control\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions design complexity control ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.