Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions defect description from" » "coder functions effect description from" (Expand search), "coder functions object description from" (Expand search), "coder functions event description from" (Expand search), "coder functional defect description from" (Expand search), "coder functional defects description from" (Expand search), "coder functions affects description from" (Expand search), "coder functions defect descriptions from" (Expand search), "coder functions defect description of" (Expand search), "coder functions defect description and" (Expand search), "power functions defect description from" (Expand search), "order functions defect description from" (Expand search), "colour functions defect description from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions defect description from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions defect description from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions defect description from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.