Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions code coverage in" » "power functions code coverage in" (Expand search), "order functions code coverage in" (Expand search), "colour functions code coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions case coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions chords coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions closed coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions care coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions and coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions the coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions code coverage of" (Expand search)
"using codigo python python programming" » "using codigo pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using codigo piton python programming" (Expand search), "using codigo pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using indigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding python python programming" (Expand search), "using codium python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions code coverage in\") OR (\"using codigo python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions code coverage in ) OR ( using codigo python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions code coverage in") OR ("using codigo python python programming"))*.