Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions case description on" » "coder functions the description on" (Expand search), "power functions case description on" (Expand search), "order functions case description on" (Expand search), "colour functions case description on" (Expand search), "coder functions are description on" (Expand search), "coder functions and description on" (Expand search), "coder functions at description on" (Expand search), "coder functions case description of" (Expand search), "coder functions case description in" (Expand search), "coder functions case description and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions case description on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions case description on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions case description on ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions case description on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.