Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functioning under documentation in" » "coder functioning and documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functioning neo documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functioning new documentation in" (Expand search), "models functioning under documentation in" (Expand search), "proper functioning under documentation in" (Expand search), "role functioning under documentation in" (Expand search), "coder function under documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions under documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functioning under documentation and" (Expand search), "coder functioning under documentation of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functioning under documentation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functioning under documentation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functioning under documentation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functioning under documentation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.