Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functioning in implementation from" » "coder functioning in implementation of" (Expand search), "coder functioning in implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning in implementation and" (Expand search), "models functioning in implementation from" (Expand search), "proper functioning in implementation from" (Expand search), "role functioning in implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning an implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning and implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning of implementation from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functioning in implementation from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functioning in implementation from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functioning in implementation from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.