Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functionality project implementation in" » "coder functionality projeto implementacao in" (Expand search), "coder fonctionalist project implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functionality profile implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functionality profiles implementation in" (Expand search), "motor functionality project implementation in" (Expand search), "poor functionality project implementation in" (Expand search), "body functionality project implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functionality project implementation and" (Expand search), "coder functionality project implementation of" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functionality project implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functionality project implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functionality project implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.