Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functional implications by programmer" » "coder educational implications by programmer" (Expand search), "coder practical implications by programmer" (Expand search), "modern functional implications by programmer" (Expand search), "border functional implications by programmer" (Expand search), "order functional implications by programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional complications by programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional implications _ programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional implications of programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional implications by programmed" (Expand search), "coder functional implications by programming" (Expand search), "coder functional implications of programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functional implications by programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functional implications by programmer\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functional implications by programmer ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.