Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function with code effects" » "modern function with code effects" (Expand search), "power function with code effects" (Expand search), "over function with code effects" (Expand search), "coder conjunction with code effects" (Expand search), "coder function with mode effects" (Expand search), "coder function with core effects" (Expand search), "coder function with diode effects" (Expand search), "coder function with co effects" (Expand search), "coder function with co2 effects" (Expand search), "coder function with cold effects" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function with code effects") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function with code effects\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function with code effects ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function with code effects") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.