Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function using relative programming" » "coder function using reactive programming" (Expand search), "coder function using reactive programing" (Expand search), "coder function using declarative programming" (Expand search), "modern function using relative programming" (Expand search), "power function using relative programming" (Expand search), "over function using relative programming" (Expand search), "coder function during relative programming" (Expand search), "coder reaction using relative programming" (Expand search), "coder function using native programming" (Expand search), "coder function using generative programming" (Expand search)
"and optimization python python programming" » "and optimization method python programming" (Expand search), "and optimization option python programming" (Expand search), "and optimization methods python programming" (Expand search), "and optimization pythons python programming" (Expand search), "and optimization piton python programming" (Expand search), "and optimization pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function using relative programming\") OR (\"and optimization python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function using relative programming ) OR ( and optimization python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function using relative programming") OR ("and optimization python python programming"))*.