Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function using complexity priors" » "coder function using complexity factors" (Expand search), "coder function using complexity from" (Expand search), "coder function using complex priors" (Expand search), "coder function using complete priors" (Expand search), "coder function design complexity priors" (Expand search), "modern function using complexity priors" (Expand search), "power function using complexity priors" (Expand search), "over function using complexity priors" (Expand search), "coder function during complexity priors" (Expand search), "coder reaction using complexity priors" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function using complexity priors\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function using complexity priors ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function using complexity priors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.