Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function used documentation in" » "coder function museum documentation in" (Expand search), "coder function reuse documentation in" (Expand search), "coder function and documentation in" (Expand search), "coder function used documentation and" (Expand search), "coder function used documentation of" (Expand search), "modern function used documentation in" (Expand search), "power function used documentation in" (Expand search), "over function used documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions used documentation in" (Expand search), "coder function based documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions based documentation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function used documentation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function used documentation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function used documentation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function used documentation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.