Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function training perceptions on" » "coder function teaching perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function learning perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function teaching perception on" (Expand search), "coder functional training perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function chaining perceptions on" (Expand search), "modern function training perceptions on" (Expand search), "power function training perceptions on" (Expand search), "over function training perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function training perceptions of" (Expand search), "coder function training perceptions and" (Expand search), "coder function training perceptions about" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function training perceptions on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function training perceptions on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function training perceptions on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.