Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function sizing algorithm in" » "coder function slicing algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function mining algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function saving algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function fitting algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function scaling algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function smoking algorithm in" (Expand search), "modern function sizing algorithm in" (Expand search), "power function sizing algorithm in" (Expand search), "over function sizing algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder function sizing algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder function sizing algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder function sizing algorithm with" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function sizing algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function sizing algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function sizing algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.