Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function sampling decisions in" » "coder function sampling precision in" (Expand search), "coder function sampling designs in" (Expand search), "coder function saving decisions in" (Expand search), "coder suction sampling decisions in" (Expand search), "coder function mapping decisions in" (Expand search), "coder section sampling decisions in" (Expand search), "modern function sampling decisions in" (Expand search), "power function sampling decisions in" (Expand search), "over function sampling decisions in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function sampling decisions in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function sampling decisions in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function sampling decisions in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function sampling decisions in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.