Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function reuse detection problem" » "coder function reuse selection problem" (Expand search), "coder function reuse detection program" (Expand search), "coder function reuse demarcation problem" (Expand search), "coder function abuse detection problem" (Expand search), "coder function use detection problem" (Expand search), "coder function aureus detection problem" (Expand search), "modern function reuse detection problem" (Expand search), "power function reuse detection problem" (Expand search), "over function reuse detection problem" (Expand search), "coder function causes detection problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function reuse detection problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function reuse detection problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function reuse detection problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.