Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function predicts cognitive programmer" » "coder function predicts cognitive programmin" (Expand search), "coder function predicts cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder function predicts cognitive grammar" (Expand search), "coder function prevents cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions predict cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "coder function prediction cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional predictions cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "modern function predicts cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "power function predicts cognitive programmer" (Expand search), "over function predicts cognitive programmer" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function predicts cognitive programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function predicts cognitive programmer\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function predicts cognitive programmer ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function predicts cognitive programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.