Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function prediction on programmer" » "modern function prediction on programmer" (Expand search), "power function prediction on programmer" (Expand search), "over function prediction on programmer" (Expand search), "coder function prediction of programmer" (Expand search), "coder function prediction in programmer" (Expand search), "coder function prediction and programmer" (Expand search), "coder function prediction on programmed" (Expand search), "coder function prediction non programmers" (Expand search), "coder function prediction of programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function prediction on programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function prediction on programmer\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function prediction on programmer ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.