Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function point duplication problem" » "coder function point lubrication problems" (Expand search), "coder function point equalization problem" (Expand search), "coder function point location problem" (Expand search), "coder function point application problem" (Expand search), "coder function line duplication problem" (Expand search), "coder function non duplication problem" (Expand search), "modern function point duplication problem" (Expand search), "power function point duplication problem" (Expand search), "over function point duplication problem" (Expand search), "coder inflection point duplication problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function point duplication problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function point duplication problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function point duplication problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function point duplication problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.