Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function planning algorithm parallelization" » "coder function planning automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder function planning algorithms parallelization" (Expand search), "coder function balancing algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder function learning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functions planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder functional planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder fraction planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "modern function planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "power function planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "over function planning algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function planning algorithm parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function planning algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function planning algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function planning algorithm parallelization") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.