Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function network implementation in" » "coder function network representation in" (Expand search), "coder function network segmentation in" (Expand search), "coder function network implementation and" (Expand search), "coder function network implementation of" (Expand search), "coder function networks implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functional network implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functional networks implementation in" (Expand search), "modern function network implementation in" (Expand search), "power function network implementation in" (Expand search), "over function network implementation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function network implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function network implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function network implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function network implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.