Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function modes implementation in" » "coder function model implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function model implementations in" (Expand search), "coder function code implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function modes implementation and" (Expand search), "coder function modes implementation of" (Expand search), "modern function modes implementation in" (Expand search), "power function modes implementation in" (Expand search), "over function modes implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function models implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function more implementation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function modes implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function modes implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function modes implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.