Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function loss complexity from" » "coder function ross complexity from" (Expand search), "coder function risks complexity from" (Expand search), "coder function case complexity from" (Expand search), "modern function loss complexity from" (Expand search), "power function loss complexity from" (Expand search), "over function loss complexity from" (Expand search), "coder functional loss complexity from" (Expand search), "coder friction loss complexity from" (Expand search), "coder function left complexity from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function loss complexity from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function loss complexity from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function loss complexity from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.