Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function java implementations based" » "coder function java implementation based" (Expand search), "coder function java implementations and" (Expand search), "coder function java implementation case" (Expand search), "coder function and implementations based" (Expand search), "coder function paa implementation based" (Expand search), "coder function case implementations based" (Expand search), "modern function java implementations based" (Expand search), "power function java implementations based" (Expand search), "over function java implementations based" (Expand search), "coder function j implementations based" (Expand search), "coder function job implementations based" (Expand search), "coder function jump implementations based" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function java implementations based") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function java implementations based\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function java implementations based ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.