Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function insertion recognition process" » "coder function intention recognition process" (Expand search), "coder function insect recognition process" (Expand search), "coder function detection recognition process" (Expand search), "coder function alteration recognition process" (Expand search), "coder function generation recognition process" (Expand search), "coder function attention recognition process" (Expand search), "modern function insertion recognition process" (Expand search), "power function insertion recognition process" (Expand search), "over function insertion recognition process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function insertion recognition process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function insertion recognition process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function insertion recognition process ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function insertion recognition process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.