Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function in embedded problem" » "coder function in embedding problem" (Expand search), "coder function in embedded program" (Expand search), "coder function in embedded mobile" (Expand search), "modern function in embedded problem" (Expand search), "power function in embedded problem" (Expand search), "over function in embedded problem" (Expand search), "coder function an embedded problem" (Expand search), "coder function of embedded problem" (Expand search), "coder function _ embedded problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function in embedded problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function in embedded problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function in embedded problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.