Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function in affective processing" » "coder function in reactive processing" (Expand search), "coder function in predictive processing" (Expand search), "coder function in cognitive processing" (Expand search), "modern function in affective processing" (Expand search), "power function in affective processing" (Expand search), "over function in affective processing" (Expand search), "coder function on affective processing" (Expand search), "coder function an affective processing" (Expand search), "coder function and affective processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function in affective processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function in affective processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function in affective processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function in affective processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.