Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function implications in process" » "coder functional implications in process" (Expand search), "coder function application in process" (Expand search), "coder functional applications in process" (Expand search), "coder function implications _ process" (Expand search), "coder function implications of process" (Expand search), "coder function applications in process" (Expand search), "modern function implications in process" (Expand search), "power function implications in process" (Expand search), "over function implications in process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function implications in process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function implications in process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function implications in process ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.