Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function have documentation from" » "coder function care documentation from" (Expand search), "coder function change documentation from" (Expand search), "coder function image documentation from" (Expand search), "coder function have documentation of" (Expand search), "coder function have documentation on" (Expand search), "coder function have argumentation from" (Expand search), "modern function have documentation from" (Expand search), "power function have documentation from" (Expand search), "over function have documentation from" (Expand search), "coder function high documentation from" (Expand search), "coder function how documentation from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function have documentation from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function have documentation from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function have documentation from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.