Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function function description model" » "coder function functional description model" (Expand search), "coder function function descriptive model" (Expand search), "coder function function desviation model" (Expand search), "coder function dysfunction description model" (Expand search), "coder junction functional description model" (Expand search), "coder function function redescription model" (Expand search), "coder function function descriptor model" (Expand search), "modern function function description model" (Expand search), "power function function description model" (Expand search), "over function function description model" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function function description model") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function function description model\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function function description model ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.