Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function function annotation proposal" » "coder function functional annotation proposal" (Expand search), "coder function function innovation proposal" (Expand search), "coder function functional annotations proposal" (Expand search), "coder function function innovation proposals" (Expand search), "coder function function adaptation proposal" (Expand search), "coder function dysfunction annotation proposal" (Expand search), "coder junction functional annotation proposal" (Expand search), "modern function function annotation proposal" (Expand search), "power function function annotation proposal" (Expand search), "over function function annotation proposal" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function function annotation proposal\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function function annotation proposal ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function function annotation proposal") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.