Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function et description from" » "coder function et descriptions from" (Expand search), "coder function et description of" (Expand search), "coder function et description and" (Expand search), "modern function et description from" (Expand search), "power function et description from" (Expand search), "over function et description from" (Expand search), "coder function set description from" (Expand search), "coder function nest description from" (Expand search), "coder function _ description from" (Expand search), "coder function elf description from" (Expand search), "coder function ecf description from" (Expand search), "coder function eof description from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function et description from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function et description from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function et description from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.