Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function deployment perceptions on" » "coder function development perception on" (Expand search), "coder function employees perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function employee perceptions on" (Expand search), "modern function deployment perceptions on" (Expand search), "power function deployment perceptions on" (Expand search), "over function deployment perceptions on" (Expand search), "coder function deployment perceptions of" (Expand search), "coder function deployment perceptions and" (Expand search), "coder function deployment perceptions about" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function deployment perceptions on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function deployment perceptions on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function deployment perceptions on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.