Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function allocation routing problem" » "coder function application routing problem" (Expand search), "coder function alteration routing problem" (Expand search), "coder donation allocation routing problem" (Expand search), "coder function location routing problem" (Expand search), "coder function allocation focusing problem" (Expand search), "coder function allocation using problem" (Expand search), "modern function allocation routing problem" (Expand search), "power function allocation routing problem" (Expand search), "over function allocation routing problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function allocation routing problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function allocation routing problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function allocation routing problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.