Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function affection recognition in" » "coder function affection cognition in" (Expand search), "coder function affective recognition in" (Expand search), "coder function action recognition in" (Expand search), "coder affection affection recognition in" (Expand search), "coder function attention recognition in" (Expand search), "coder function ejection recognition in" (Expand search), "modern function affection recognition in" (Expand search), "power function affection recognition in" (Expand search), "over function affection recognition in" (Expand search), "coder function affection recognition and" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function affection recognition in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function affection recognition in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function affection recognition in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.