Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function act implementation in" » "coder function and implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function an implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function iot implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function act implementation and" (Expand search), "coder function act implementation of" (Expand search), "modern function act implementation in" (Expand search), "power function act implementation in" (Expand search), "over function act implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function fact implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function at implementation in" (Expand search), "coder function facts implementation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function act implementation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function act implementation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function act implementation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.