Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization" » "coder feeding neumann automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding neural algorithms parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "powder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "under feeding neumann algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "worker feeding neumann algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.