Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder feeding _ algorithm parallelization" » "coder feeding _ automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "powder feeding _ algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "under feeding _ algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "worker feeding _ algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder feeding _ algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder feeding _ algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder feeding _ algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder feeding _ algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.