Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder fast segmentation algorithm in" » "coder fast segmentation algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder fast selection algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder based segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder and segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder text segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder fast segmentation algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder fast segmentation algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder fast segmentation algorithm with" (Expand search), "codes fast segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "under fast segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coded last segmentation algorithm in" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder fast segmentation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder fast segmentation algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder fast segmentation algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder fast segmentation algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.