Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder exploiting convolutional algorithm in" » "coder improving convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder exploiting evolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder applying convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder exploiting convolution algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder exploiting coevolutionary algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder exploiting conventional algorithm in" (Expand search), "cancer exploiting convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "models exploiting convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "water exploiting convolutional algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder exploiting convolutional algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder exploiting convolutional algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder exploiting convolutional algorithm with" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder exploiting convolutional algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder exploiting convolutional algorithm in\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder exploiting convolutional algorithm in ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder exploiting convolutional algorithm in") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.