Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder discourse practices algorithm in" » "coder discursive practices algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discursive practice algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse practical algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder discourse fractions algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse price algorithm in" (Expand search), "code discourse practices algorithm in" (Expand search), "coded discourse practices algorithm in" (Expand search), "border discourse practices algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse practices algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder discourse practices algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder discourse practices algorithm with" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder discourse practices algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder discourse practices algorithm in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder discourse practices algorithm in ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder discourse practices algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.