Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder discourse objective algorithm in" » "coder discourse objects algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse object algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse affective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse objective algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder discourse multiobjective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse competitive algorithm in" (Expand search), "code discourse objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coded discourse objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "border discourse objective algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse objective algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder discourse objective algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder discourse objective algorithm with" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder discourse objective algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder discourse objective algorithm in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder discourse objective algorithm in ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder discourse objective algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.