Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder discourse invention algorithm in" » "coder discoursive intention algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse intonation algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse interaction algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse inversion algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse inversion algorithms in" (Expand search), "coder discourse induction algorithm in" (Expand search), "code discourse invention algorithm in" (Expand search), "coded discourse invention algorithm in" (Expand search), "border discourse invention algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse invention algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder discourse invention algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder discourse invention algorithm with" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder discourse invention algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder discourse invention algorithm in\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder discourse invention algorithm in ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder discourse invention algorithm in") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.