Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder discourse features algorithm in" » "coder discoursive features algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discursive features algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse gesture algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse fracture algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse yates algorithm in" (Expand search), "code discourse features algorithm in" (Expand search), "coded discourse features algorithm in" (Expand search), "border discourse features algorithm in" (Expand search), "coder discourse features algorithm and" (Expand search), "coder discourse features algorithm _" (Expand search), "coder discourse features algorithm with" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder discourse features algorithm in\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder discourse features algorithm in ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder discourse features algorithm in") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.