Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection using sequence coding" » "code detection using sequence coding" (Expand search), "border detection using sequence coding" (Expand search), "corner detection using sequence coding" (Expand search), "coder detection using sequences encoding" (Expand search), "coder detection using sequence coupling" (Expand search), "coder detection using sequence typing" (Expand search), "coder detection using frequency coding" (Expand search), "coder detection single sequence coding" (Expand search), "coder detection mixing sequence coding" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection using sequence coding") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection using sequence coding\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection using sequence coding ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection using sequence coding") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.