Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection in java programing" » "code detection in java programing" (Expand search), "border detection in java programing" (Expand search), "corner detection in java programing" (Expand search), "coder detection in java programming" (Expand search), "coder detection in java programs" (Expand search), "coder detection in meta programming" (Expand search), "coder detection and java programing" (Expand search), "coder detection in japan programing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection in java programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection in java programing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection in java programing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.