Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection in complexity priors" » "coder detection in complexity factors" (Expand search), "coder detection in complexity from" (Expand search), "code detection in complexity priors" (Expand search), "border detection in complexity priors" (Expand search), "corner detection in complexity priors" (Expand search), "coder detection on complexity priors" (Expand search), "coder detection and complexity priors" (Expand search), "coder detection _ complexity priors" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection in complexity priors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection in complexity priors\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection in complexity priors ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection in complexity priors") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.