Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection functions in programmable" » "coder selection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "coder retention functions in programmable" (Expand search), "coder protection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "code detection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "border detection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "corner detection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection functions _ programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection functions of programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection functions field programmable" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection functions in programmable\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection functions in programmable ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection functions in programmable") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.