Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection function second processing" » "coder detection functions second processing" (Expand search), "coder selection function second processing" (Expand search), "coder retention function second processing" (Expand search), "coder detection function seafood processing" (Expand search), "coder detection function records processing" (Expand search), "coder detection function seed processing" (Expand search), "code detection function second processing" (Expand search), "border detection function second processing" (Expand search), "corner detection function second processing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection function second processing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection function second processing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection function second processing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.