Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection function in programmable" » "coder detection functions in programmable" (Expand search), "coder selection function in programmable" (Expand search), "coder retention function in programmable" (Expand search), "code detection function in programmable" (Expand search), "border detection function in programmable" (Expand search), "corner detection function in programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection function _ programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection function of programmable" (Expand search), "coder detection function field programmable" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection function in programmable") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection function in programmable\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection function in programmable ) OR ( using coding python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder detection function in programmable") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.